1. Identification and qualification
We map the regulatory and compliance obligations your company must meet, today and in the near future, and weigh the significance of each one.
NOSCONFORMES®: AUDIT AND REGULATORY
Every regulatory obligation under a single point of management
Your company answers to several standards at once, and each one demands its own evidence, deadlines, and controls. NosConformes® brings all of it into one place so you stop handling audits in emergency mode.
HOW IT WORKS
From the obligation map to a process that holds on its own
A DM11® consulting method that first understands what applies to your operation and only then designs how you will meet it.
2. Structuring the overlaps
We study the requirements across every applicable standard and cross-reference what repeats. One control usually satisfies several demands at once.
3. Management model
We build the planning, response, and follow-up process, with clear owners, evidence, and a calendar everyone can work from.
4. Running routine
Your team responds on time, with the evidence at hand, and no scramble the night before an audit.
What your company gains
- Every audit and regulatory requirement centralized in one place
- One control answering several standards at once
- An end to rework and to the strain on your internal teams
- Faster processes, and no improvised answers
- Internal teams freed up for strategic work
- A process built around the standards that apply to your operation, not a generic checklist
SELF-ASSESSMENT
Are you ready for your next audit?
Objective questions about how your company handles its regulatory and audit obligations. The result shows where the process stands on its own and where compliance runs on scramble and memory.
Obligations mapQuestion 1 of 16
Is there a single list of the regulatory, standards and contractual obligations the company must meet, reviewed within the last year?
Laws, certifiable standards, regulator demands and customer contract clauses. A spreadsheet counts. If the answer lives in one person's head, it is not a list yet.
What each result means
The reading for each area, across the three result ranges. It is the same text emailed to those who identify themselves, published here for anyone who wants to understand what the score measures before answering.
Obligations map
Below 50
Without a list of what applies, compliance is reactive by definition: the company discovers an obligation when it comes calling. Start by writing down what is already known, including customer contract requirements, and accept that the first version will be incomplete. It already changes the conversation about priority and budget.
50 to 79
The list exists, but it has gaps or stops at the names of standards. Breaking each one down into concrete requirements is what turns the map into a working tool: it shows what is covered, what is missing, and the real size of each obligation.
80 or above
The obligations map is among the strongest areas in your answers. The next gain is wiring it to the operation: each requirement pointing to the control that meets it and to the evidence that proves it.
Owners and deadlines
Below 50
An obligation without an owner is handled by whoever remembers, and a deadline without a calendar is a scheduled surprise. Both fixes are cheap: one name per obligation and one calendar of deadlines and audits. Neither requires a tool. Both require a decision.
50 to 79
Owners exist, but follow-up depends on each one's initiative, and delays only surface once they have become urgent. A fixed status cadence, even short and monthly, makes problems appear while they are still cheap.
80 or above
Owners and deadlines well resolved in your answers. The next refinement is succession: making sure every obligation has a backup who knows where things are, so vacations and departures do not open holes.
Organized evidence
Below 50
Evidence assembled on the eve costs twice: in team hours and in the impression it leaves on the auditor. The game-changing move is making evidence a byproduct of routine: if the control works, its record produces itself, instead of becoming a project.
50 to 79
Evidence exists, but it is scattered, and finding what the auditor asked for is still archaeology. A single repository with standard naming, by obligation and by period, cuts most of the cost of every audit.
80 or above
Organized evidence in your answers. The next step is a quality review before delivery: dates, approvals and samples checked by someone who did not produce the evidence.
Synergy across standards
Below 50
Answering each standard in isolation means paying several times for the same control: access, backup and change management appear in nearly all of them. Cross-mapping requirements is analysis done once, and the discount repeats at every audit.
50 to 79
Some of the overlap is already captured, but the cross-map is informal, living in the heads of whoever handles it. Documenting the requirements-per-control matrix turns that personal saving into a company saving.
80 or above
Synergy across standards is among the strongest areas in your answers. The next gain is extending the logic to evidence: one collection, one standard format, serving every audit that requires it.
Audit readiness
Below 50
Without an internal check, the external auditor is the first person to test your controls, and the result goes into their report. An internal review with real lead time turns findings into fixes. And an old finding with no closure plan is the first thing the next audit checks.
50 to 79
Preparation exists, but the handling itself still improvises: who answers, what requests go through, who talks to the auditor. Defining that script prevents the diverging answers that open unnecessary lines of questioning.
80 or above
Mature audit readiness in your answers. Keep previous findings under closure verification and rehearse the handling with people who have never done it: a process that only works with veterans still depends on luck.
Regulatory radar
Below 50
Today, a new requirement would probably reach your company as a demand, not as a notice. Defining who watches what is coming, with defined sources, is a cheap control that buys compliance's most valuable asset: time.
50 to 79
The radar exists, but what it catches does not always become action: the change is known and the map stays the same. Closing the loop with impact assessment and an update deadline is what separates watching from being ready.
80 or above
A working regulatory radar in your answers. The next refinement is watching what the business plans too: a new market, a new product and a big new customer usually bring new obligations with them.
Ready to take audits out of emergency mode?
Show our team the standards your company has to meet. We will come back with the map of overlaps and where to start.