The necessary ones make the site work. The others measure which pages help and which ads bring the people who need DM11. Your choice, and you can revisit it from the footer.
Cybersecurity
We talk your artificial intelligence into doing what it should not.
AI system security is not application security under another name. Here the attack arrives written in natural language, inside text the model reads, and what was content starts to count as instructions. We work from the recognized references for attacks on AI systems instead of improvising.
You choose the target. On the application, we attack what is exposed: command injection hidden in text, bypassing restrictions, leaking internal instructions, abusing the tools the assistant can trigger. On the model and pipeline, we look behind the application: the provenance of models and data, the chance of poisoning the training or extracting the model, and the supply chain of components. Together they cover everything from the front door to the foundation.
The engagement ranges from a single pass, good for a first read, to the full cycle with multiple professionals on different fronts, cross review, and retesting after fixes. This matters here because the same system responds differently to the same attempt at different moments. A single pass finds less than it seems.
From you, we need formal authorization, including the vendor's when the model belongs to a third party, and access to the target. You receive the red team report with every attack that worked and how to reproduce it, the mapping of techniques against the knowledge base of attacks on AI systems, and the prioritized remediation plan.
The stages and deliverables below describe the The AI application · Full DM11 methodology modality. The other modalities appear when you request the proposal.
Planning and authorisation
We agree the scope in writing and set the windows, the emergency contacts and the formal authorisations. No test starts without that.
Adversarial attack
We try to talk the system into doing what it should not, chaining techniques the way a real adversary would.
Report
We consolidate the findings into a report where every item comes with severity, evidence and the path to fix it. We write to be read by the people who will act, not to fatten pages.
Cross review
A second professional repeats the main tests, at a different hour. It is the stage that most often catches what the first one walked past.
Retest
Once your team has fixed things, we come back and confirm item by item that the gap closed.
Presentation
A meeting with leadership translating the technical result into business risk and investment decisions. We arrive with the answers to the questions the board always asks: what to attack first, how much effort it takes and what happens if nothing is done.
Usually comes together with
Not a bundle, and it changes nothing you have already chosen. It is what tends to come up next, in the experience of companies that have been through this.